17: The DSM-IV-TR: A Multiaxial System for Psychiatric Diagnosis

Published on 24/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Psychiatry

Last modified 24/05/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 26748 times

CHAPTER 17 The DSM-IV-TR: A Multiaxial System for Psychiatric Diagnosis


Psychiatric diagnostic classification serves a variety of clinical and other purposes. Diagnosis marks the borders between mental disorders and nondisorders (such as normal personality variations and stressful life problems) and between one type of disorder and another.1 Diagnostic schemata have practical implications for helping clinicians to conceptualize psychiatric issues, to communicate with patients and other clinicians, and, ideally, to make prognostic predictions and to plan effective treatments.2,3 A useful diagnostic system also enables psychiatric research to flourish. It permits valid and reliable classification of patients in clinical research settings and defines practical human problems that may inspire and benefit from basic research efforts. Recorded efforts to document, describe, and classify mental illness go back thousands of years; they include attempts to group diseases by cross-sectional phenomenology, by theories of causation, and, later, by clinical course.4

In the United States, the diagnostic system in widest current use is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR).5 The DSM has been increasingly disseminated internationally. The World Health Organization’s International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10),6 has also been in wide use in other countries for classifying psychiatric disorders. While the ICD-10 correlates more closely with DSM-IV-TR, the previous version, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM),7 is still used in the United States for coding purposes within medical billing systems for both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric medical disorders.4

The DSM-IV-TR represents the latest in an ongoing process of change in our psychiatric diagnostic system, with the next major revision, DSM-V, expected to be released in 2010 or thereafter.8 While the original Diagnostic and Statistical Manual: Mental Disorders was published in 1952,9 the transition from the second edition (DSM-II)10 to the third edition (DSM-III)11 represented a particular change in emphasis. Psychodynamic formulations were no longer intrinsic to diagnostic categorization, and the DSM-III was to be considered atheoretical and descriptive in orientation, using a multiaxial system. As subsequent revisions were made,5,12,13 there were increasing efforts to ensure diagnostic reliability and validity, to incorporate research findings, and to gather new information via field trials.3,1417


The DSM-IV-TR uses a system of multiaxial assessment to promote evaluation and description of multiple kinds of information (Table 17-1). The multiaxial format succinctly organizes problems that will be both highly relevant and subject to change in the course of treatment. An illustration of one way that clinical material might be recorded in the DSM-IV-TR multiaxial format is provided in Box 17-1, with an example of a 28-year-old woman undergoing psychiatric evaluation. This multiaxial assessment asserts that this patient currently has certain affective, characterological, medical, relational, and environmental difficulties that are substantially impairing function. While the texture of this woman’s individual life story may emerge more clearly from the narrative description, constructing and reviewing the five axes provides a structure that may help the clinician begin to consider medications, psychotherapies, and psychosocial or systemic interventions that could be helpful. Nonetheless, it is up to the psychiatrist in his or her clinical interactions to maintain curiosity about how the problems on each axis are constituted and relate to the others for this patient—how they developed, what meaning may be attached to the problems and their treatment, and how they may be amenable or resistant to change.

Table 17-1 The Five Axes of Diagnosis

Axis I Clinical disorders
  Other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention
Axis II Personality disorders
  Mental retardation
Axis III General medical conditions
Axis IV Psychosocial/environmental problems
Axis V Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score

BOX 17-1 Recording Clinical Material in the Multiaxial Format

Clinical Scenario

You are working at a free clinic and evaluate a 28-year-old woman who complains that she has been recently fired from her job as an accounting bookkeeper due to inconsistent attendance. Three months ago, she finally left her husband, who used to hit her when he got drunk. Since then, she has found it increasingly difficult to get out of bed in the morning. She feels tired, heavy, and empty most of the time, naps several hours per day, and has gained 10 pounds. She recently dropped out of the book club at her church; she could not concentrate to read for more than 5 to 10 pages at a time, and felt that the other members were probably blaming her for the end of her marriage. Her asthma has been flaring up, as she has been unable to pay for her medications since losing her job, and she often feels short of breath, which increases her worry. Last week, her estranged husband showed up at her apartment and pushed and threatened her. Since then, she has been wishing she were dead but feels “too chicken” to follow through with suicide.

While she has never felt so empty and sad before, she does note that she has lost other jobs in the past. When her fears that co-workers were making fun of her clothing and conversational skills escalated, her asthma would often begin to act up. She would then repeatedly call in sick until she was fired, never getting a doctor’s note. She describes herself as shy in childhood and never dated until she met her husband, who pursued her for months before she agreed to go out with him. Although she used to enjoy the book club, she has never felt safe discussing personal matters with anyone there, except her friend from grade school, who introduced her into the group. Most of the time, she made few comments, for fear that she would be exposed as unsophisticated.

Axis I

Axis I contains what the DSM-IV-TR labels “Clinical Disorders”: all psychiatric disorders included in the DSM except for the personality disorders and mental retardation, which are recorded on Axis II (Box 17-2). In addition, Axis I is the location to record “Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of Clinical Attention,” which includes medication side effects and a variety of social and relational problems (Box 17-3). All Axis I diagnoses that are relevant to care should be listed in order of clinical concern, with the most important diagnosis listed first.

Various algorithms are available to help maneuver through the DSM, including those in Appendix A of the DSM-IV-TR, “Decision Trees for Differential Diagnosis.” An example for the anxiety disorders is shown in Figure 17-1; others are delineated elsewhere in this textbook. When making the determination of which DSM-IV-TR Axis I diagnoses best fit a particular patient, it is important to attend to which diagnoses are hierarchical and mutually exclusive and which may be co-morbid/co-existing in an individual patient at the same time. For example, a patient may have a long-standing specific phobia of heights, develop obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adolescence, and then develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following an injury in adulthood, resulting in three co-morbid anxiety disorders at the time of presentation at age 45. On the other hand, the criteria for adjustment disorder clearly state that before assigning this diagnosis, the clinician must determine that the symptoms do not fulfill criteria for another Axis I disorder and are not related to an exacerbation of another Axis I or II disorder. Likewise, a nonpsychiatric medical or substance-induced etiology must typically be ruled out to the clinician’s clinical satisfaction before any other Axis I disorder can be diagnosed.

Most sections of the DSM also include “Not Otherwise Specified (NOS)” diagnoses, such as alcohol-related disorder NOS, dissociative disorder NOS, or eating disorder NOS. When used alone or in combination, these may be used to describe disorders that, although clinically significant, do not fit neatly into the major diagnostic categories, or where more data are required before a more precise diagnosis can be assigned. When applicable, diagnosis deferred, no diagnosis, or unspecified mental disorder (nonpsychotic) could be recorded on Axis I. Another option to signal diagnostic uncertainty is to mark a diagnosis as provisional, meaning that the selected diagnosis is expected to emerge over time or with new information. An example of how Axis I diagnoses may evolve in the setting of clinical uncertainty and change is shown in Box 17-4.

BOX 17-4 Axis I: Diagnostic Evolution over Time

You evaluate a 6-year-old child who is extremely impulsive, talkative, hyperkinetic, and distractible. While this has created significant behavioral and interpersonal difficulties, his parents do not describe him as particularly irritable, aggressive, or euphoric. You plan to treat him initially as if he has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but are quite concerned about his strong family history of mania and will be watching closely for the possibility of bipolar disorder as a revised or additional diagnosis. You report Axis I as follows:

A few visits later, although the boy has not yet started the stimulant medication you have been discussing with his parents, you note that his mood is substantially more irritable than you have previously seen. He starts screaming and throws several metal toy trains at his mother’s head after she says they cannot go to the playground when the visit is over. His parents say that this is not at all unusual for him, and attribute it to the chocolate candies he was eating in the car ride to your office. You revise Axis I as follows:

Or, depending on your experience of the interaction and clinical judgment (was the child already irritable before his mother’s question about the playground? Did his mother’s verbal and nonverbal response feel harsh and devaluing or like skillful limit setting? Could the chocolate really be contributory?), you might revise Axis I in this way:

A few months later, after you have been working closely with the family, you may have a fuller view of the clinical scenario, new treatment recommendations (including a mood stabilizer and parent guidance work), and a new Axis I that reflects the shift in your understanding. The boy’s mood problem is clearly on the bipolar spectrum, and his parents’ characteristic responses to his tantrums often prolong them. And, although you are now less sure that you feel comfortable prescribing a stimulant, for fear of exacerbating his mood disorder, diagnostically you are more certain that the boy has ADHD symptoms that persist even when he is in a relatively stable mood.

Specifiers may also be added to Axis I diagnoses to provide additional information about the clinical course, features, and severity. Current severity can be indicated with specifiers (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe). When symptoms have substantially improved, the following specifiers may be used: in partial remission, in full remission, or prior history. While guidance is included in the DSM-IV-TR about the definition of these specifiers for some conditions (e.g., conduct disorder, substance dependence, and manic episode), the psychiatrist may apply them to other disorders using his or her clinical judgment. Some disorders have their own specifiers listed in the DSM-IV-TR, such as “with delayed onset” for PTSD. Others have various mutually exclusive subtypes, such as blood-injection-injury type or natural environment type for specific phobia (see Figure 17-1). In some cases, as with mood disorders, the DSM-IV-TR provides instructions for representing specifiers or subtypes via the fifth digit of the ICD-9-CM numerical diagnostic code.

Axis II

Axis II contains personality disorders (Table 17-2) and mental retardation (Table 17-3). Borderline intellectual functioning, although not considered a mental disorder, is also coded on Axis II. As with Axis I, multiple diagnoses should be listed on Axis II if present. If an Axis II diagnosis, rather than one or more co-morbid Axis I disorders, is the primary clinical concern, this may be noted by qualifying it in parentheses as principal diagnosis or reason for visit. Given that additional evaluation time or clinical information may be needed to diagnose Axis II disorders, it may be appropriate to specify no diagnosis or diagnosis deferred. In addition, personality traits that do not meet full criteria for a personality disorder, but are nonetheless maladaptive, may be listed on Axis II without the use of a diagnostic code, as may defensive patterns.4 The DSM-IV-TR provides examples of specific defensive patterns in Appendix B, in the “Glossary of Specific Defense Mechanisms and Coping Styles.” The Defensive Functioning Scale (pp. 807-810)5 is included as a “Proposed Axis for Further Study,” with the suggestion that this hierarchical ranking of defensive styles be placed below Axis V. In practice, inclusion of specific defensive patterns or a defensive level might be more easily incorporated into Axis II.4 Box 17-5 is an example of using Axis II in a way that may enhance clinical communication within a mental health care system.

Table 17-2 Axis II: Personality Disorders

Buy Membership for Psychiatry Category to continue reading. Learn more here
Cluster A Paranoid Personality Disorder
  Schizoid Personality Disorder
  Schizotypal Personality Disorder
Cluster B Antisocial Personality Disorder
  Borderline Personality Disorder
  Histrionic Personality Disorder
  Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Cluster C Avoidant Personality Disorder
  Dependent Personality Disorder