132: Motor Neuron Disease

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Last modified 22/05/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1838 times

CHAPTER 132

Motor Neuron Disease

Nanette C. Joyce, DO, MAS; Gregory T. Carter, MD, MS

Synonyms

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease)

Progressive muscular atrophy

Primary lateral sclerosis

Progressive bulbar palsy

Adult spinal muscular atrophy

Spinobulbar muscular atrophy (Kennedy disease)

ICD-9 Codes

335.10  Spinal muscular atrophy

  Spinal muscular atrophy, unspecified

335.11  Kugelberg-Welander disease

335.19  Other spinal muscular atrophy

  Adult spinal muscular atrophy

335.20  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

  Motor neuron disease

335.21  Progressive muscular atrophy

  Duchenne-Aran muscular atrophy

  Progressive muscular atrophy (pure)

335.22  Progressive bulbar palsy

335.23  Pseudobulbar palsy

335.24  Primary lateral sclerosis

335.29  Other motor neuron diseases

ICD-10 Codes

G12.9   Spinal muscular atrophy, unspecified

G12.1   Other inherited spinal muscular atrophy, including adult spinal muscular atrophy, Kugelberg-Welander disease

G12.21  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, progressive spinal muscle atrophy

G12.20  Motor neuron disease, unspecified

G12.22  Progressive bulbar palsy

G12.29  Other motor neuron disease, primary lateral sclerosis

Definition

The term motor neuron disease encompasses a heterogeneous group of progressive neuromuscular disorders characterized by the selective loss of upper or lower motor neurons. However, motor neuron disease is also used interchangeably with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which can be confusing for the uninitiated. ALS is the most common adult motor neuron disease. For the diagnostic criteria for ALS to be met, both upper and lower motor neuron involvement is necessary [1,2]. In sporadic cases with only lower motor neuron dysfunction, the disease is called progressive muscular atrophy; if upper motor neuron dysfunction is singularly present, it is primary lateral sclerosis; and if dysfunction is localized to the bulbar region, the disease is called progressive bulbar palsy. Most patients initially diagnosed as having progressive muscular atrophy, primary lateral sclerosis, or progressive bulbar palsy eventually progress to meet diagnostic criteria for ALS [3]. Those who do not convert have a slower rate of disease progression. This chapter focuses on ALS as the management principles are similar for the entire class of motor neuron diseases.

The prevalence of ALS is about 6 to 8 per 100,000 people, with an annual incidence of approximately 2 cases per 100,000 people. Men are more commonly affected than women, with a ratio nearing 2:1. Most cases of ALS are sporadic, having unknown etiology. Only 5% to 10% of patients have familial ALS, which is most commonly transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion. Approximately 30% to 40% of familial cases in the United States and Europe are caused by mutations in the C9orf72 gene; 20% worldwide are caused by mutations in the SOD1 (superoxide dismutase) gene; and rarer forms of familial ALS have been linked to mutations in the TARDBP, FUS, ANG, ALS2, SETX, and VAPB genes [4,5]. Other inherited adult motor neuron diseases are Kennedy disease (X-linked recessive) and adult spinal muscular atrophy (autosomal recessive), which are purely lower motor neuron disorders with greatly increased life span compared with ALS.

ALS causes rapid, progressive skeletal muscle weakness and atrophy, leading to premature death by respiratory failure. Weakness begins in a focal region, such as a single limb, the bulbar muscles, or the respiratory muscles, and spreads to affect other regions. Extraocular muscles and bowel and bladder sphincter function are often spared until late in the disease course. Mean age at onset is the mid-50s, but ALS may develop in adults of any age. Rare juvenile familial forms exist with onset before the age of 25 years. Mean survival, without tracheostomy, is 3 years from diagnosis but ranges from less than 1 year to more than 20 years. One explanation for this extreme variability is that ALS is multiple disorders without a single etiology but rather with multiple causes, sharing a common final step in the pathophysiologic pathway—motor neuron apoptosis. This is illustrated by the varying phenotypes associated with familial forms of ALS [3]. Theories about the pathogenesis of sporadic ALS have implicated RNA toxicity, glutamate excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, protein misfolding, glial cell activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, to name a few [5].

Symptoms

Early symptoms of ALS can be subtle and include muscle twitching and cramping, weakness, and loss of coordination. Patients with a predominantly upper motor neuron syndrome often present with muscle stiffness, weakness, loss of dexterity, and loss of voluntary motor control from spasticity that may affect vocal quality or limb function. Patients with a predominantly lower motor neuron syndrome may present with weakness and muscle atrophy, fasciculations, muscle cramps, and flaccid dysarthria. Bulbar symptoms include dysarthria, dysphagia, sialorrhea (drooling), and pseudobulbar affect—laughing or crying in exaggeration of or incongruent with mood. Symptoms are initially painless and asymmetric across limbs. As the disease relentlessly progresses, weakness and atrophy spread to affect all skeletal muscles, causing significant impairment and disability. If patients do not succumb first to respiratory failure, they will ultimately transition from independent function to total dependence.

Respiratory failure is the presenting symptom in a rare few. Constitutional symptoms of weight loss and generalized fatigue are common. Cognitive symptoms including behavioral or executive dysfunction have been reported to occur in 33% to 51% of patients [6]. Most have milder symptoms; approximately 5% to 14% meet clinical criteria for a diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia [6].

Physical Examination

Physical examination of a patient with suspected motor neuron disease should be aimed at establishing the certainty of diagnosis. ALS is diagnosed clinically, and the patient with suspected motor neuron disease requires a thorough neurologic examination, assessing each of the four major body regions (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbar) for signs of upper and lower motor neuron involvement. The “gold standard” for the diagnosis of upper motor neuron disease is establishment of the presence of pathologic reflexes—a brisk jaw jerk, Hoffmann sign, abdominal skin reflex, and Babinski sign. Increased muscle stretch reflex responses as demonstrated by increased spread and amplitude or clonus are considered pathologic. Reflexes that would be graded normal but are elicited from atrophied and weak muscles should also be considered pathologic. Evidence of lower motor neuron disease includes muscle weakness, atrophy, hypotonia, hyporeflexia, and fasciculations. Patients with ALS may be hyperreflexic and hyporeflexic, depending on the stage at which they are in the disease process and whether they have a predominance of upper or lower motor neuron phenotype. For example, hyperreflexia occurs in the patient with upper motor neuron dysfunction, but this sign can be overcome and silenced by concomitant lower motor neuron loss causing muscle atrophy and hyporeflexia. Because ALS is an asymmetric and spreading process, the upper motor neuron signs may be more predominant than the lower motor neuron signs, or vice versa, within any single limb or between limbs and body regions. These examination findings will change over time as the disease progresses. The tongue should be examined for fasciculations, atrophy, strength, and range of motion. The patient’s mental status, nonmotor cranial nerve function, sensory examination, and cerebellar examination findings are usually normal.

In patients with an established diagnosis, the physical examination documents disease progression and includes the musculoskeletal and cardiorespiratory systems in addition to the neurologic evaluation. The musculoskeletal examination focuses on assessment of range of motion and evaluation of painful joints or soft tissue structures. Because progressive respiratory failure is a ubiquitous manifestation of ALS, follow-up appointments should be scheduled regularly (i.e., every 3 months) and the cardiorespiratory system assessed at each visit. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal inspiratory, maximal expiratory, and peak cough pressures can be measured with a spirometer in the office setting and should be considered part of the regular cardiorespiratory follow-up evaluation, providing relevant information for clinical decision-making and prognosis (Table 132.1).

Functional Limitations

The pattern of progressive functional limitation is directly related to the patient’s motor neuron disease phenotype. Bulbar-onset ALS initially affects the patient’s ability to speak and to swallow and typically spreads to involve the muscles of the upper extremities before the lower extremities [7]. These patients have a difficult time maintaining their weight both because of dysphagia and because of the loss of upper limb strength that impairs their ability to feed themselves. Eventually, bulbar-predominant patients become anarthric with accompanying severe dysphagia that limits their ability to control their secretions and to swallow their own saliva.

The functional limitations that develop in patients with spinal-onset ALS are the direct or indirect result of muscle weakness and atrophy. In lumbar spine onset, gait is abnormal early in the disease secondary to footdrop or hip flexion weakness. As the disease progresses, the patient’s mobility worsens. Eventually, even the most basic activities of daily living become impossible to perform. Patients often transition quickly from independence to total dependence.

Reactive depression, generalized fatigue, and musculoskeletal pain may further limit function.

Diagnostic Studies

The diagnosis of ALS is based on the combined clinical and electrodiagnostic examinations. Neuroimaging and clinical laboratory studies are used to exclude other conditions that mimic ALS. All patients thought to have a motor neuron disease should undergo electrodiagnostic testing. The Awaji-shima revised El Escorial criteria (Table 132.2) are used to establish the certainty level of the diagnosis of ALS [1,2]. These criteria were developed as a tool for clinical trial enrollment but are commonly used in the clinic. The revised criteria classify the certainty level of diagnosis into one of three categories: definite, probable, and possible, which no longer includes the categories of Suspected ALS or Probable ALS Laboratory Supported that were part of the El Escorial criteria (Fig. 132.1). In addition to both upper and lower motor neuron findings, a diagnosis of ALS requires evidence of progressive spread of signs or symptoms within a single body region or from one of the four body regions to another. Certainty level of diagnosis depends on how many regions reveal upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron disease [1]. Electrophysiologic findings of denervation, including positive sharp waves, fibrillation potentials, and fasciculation potentials, are used to confirm lower motor neuron dysfunction in clinically affected regions and to detect subclinical lower motor neuron dysfunction, thereby extending the clinical examination. Signs of denervation observed during electromyography are now considered equivalent to lower motor neuron symptoms on clinical examination [1].

Table 132.2

Awaji-shima Revised El Escorial Criteria: Clinical Certainty Levels for the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [1]

Clinical Certainty Clinical or Electrophysiologic Evidence
Clinically definite UMN and LMN findings in at least three body regions
Clinically probable UMN and LMN findings in at least two body regions with UMN findings rostral to LMN findings
Clinically possible UMN and LMN findings in one body region, or
UMN findings in at least two body regions without LMN findings, or
LMN findings that are rostral to UMN findings

t0015

LMN, lower motor neuron; UMN, upper motor neuron. Four body regions: bulbar, cervical, thoracic, lumbar.

f132-01-9781455775774
FIGURE 132.1 El Escorial criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). EMG, electromyography; LMN, lower motor neuron; NCV, nerve conduction velocity; UMN, upper motor neuron. (From Krivickas LS. Motor neuron disease. In Frontera WR, Silver JK, Rizzo TD Jr, eds. Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2008.)

Imaging studies are used to exclude possibilities other than motor neuron disease from the differential diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging is the primary imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with suspected ALS. Almost all patients should have magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine to exclude cord compression, syrinx, or other spinal cord disease. The location of symptoms will dictate whether other regions of the spinal cord should be imaged. In those presenting with bulbar symptoms, brain magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude stroke, tumor, syringobulbia, and other pathologic processes.

In most neuromuscular clinics, a routine panel of laboratory tests is performed for all patients thought to have ALS. A suggested set of such tests is provided in Table 132.3. The rationale behind the performance of this extensive battery of tests is to assess the general health of the patient and to exclude treatable conditions. The differential diagnosis, developed after the history and physical examination, may suggest that more specialized testing be performed. Table 132.4 suggests additional tests that may be warranted when the presentation is atypical with a progressive muscular atrophy, primary lateral sclerosis, or progressive bulbar palsy phenotype. When there is a family history of motor neuron disease, genetic testing may be considered.