CHAPTER 12. HEPATIC DISEASE
Pamela Sue Spencer
ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Cirrhosis of the liver represents the final common pathway of many hepatic disorders characterized by chronic cellular destruction. An intervening stage of increased fibrosis is followed by formation of parenchymal regenerative nodules. It is the nodular distortion of the lobules and vascular network that defines cirrhosis and ultimately plays a critical part in the development of portal hypertension (Fitz, 2003). The cellular and biochemical events leading to this altered growth response and resulting architectural distortion are not well characterized (Yamada, 1998). Cirrhosis accounts for over 40,000 deaths each year in the United States and more than 228,145 years of potential life lost. The average patient with alcoholic liver disease loses 12 years of productive life, a much larger loss than that for heart disease (2 years) and cancer (4 years) (Fitz, 2003).
Causes of Cirrhosis
Common causes are (1) ethanol, (2) chronic hepatitis C virus infection, and (3) chronic hepatitis B virus infection with or without hepatitis D virus infection.
Infrequent causes are (1) primary biliary cirrhosis, (2) primary sclerosing cholangitis, (3) secondary biliary cirrhosis, (4) autoimmune hepatitis, (5) hemochromatosis, and (6) cryptogenic cirrhosis.
Rare causes are (1) Wilson disease, (2) α 1-antitrypsin deficiency, (3) small bowel bypass, (4) methotrexate, (5) amiodarone, (6) methyldopa, (7) cystic fibrosis, (8) sarcoidosis, (9) glycogen storage disease, and (10) hypervitaminosis A.
Malignancy can be a cause of end-stage hepatic disease and is often potentiated by the risk factors associated with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B infection, cirrhosis, hemochromatosis, and ingestion of estrogens and androgens. The progression of disease occurs via direct extension within or from around the liver. Tumors typically alter blood flow within the liver, resulting in the rapid spread of tumor. In patients with advanced disease, pneumonia, hepatic failure, and hemorrhage are frequently the cause of death. Tamponade can occur within the liver and lead to necrosis and rupture, and ultimately hemorrhage. If left untreated, death can occur in approximately 6 to 8 weeks.
Hepatic failure can also take the form of a rejected liver transplant. Obviously, these patients and families come to palliative care with unique issues. While the end-stage symptoms of cirrhosis and liver failure are the same, the meaning of the illness for the patient and family is important to recognize, explore, and incorporate into the individual plan of care.
Acetaminophen
The majority of medications used in the palliative care setting are metabolized through the liver (Bernard & Bruera, 2000; Kuebler et al., 2003). If used inappropriately, many of these medications can cause liver injury; acetaminophen poisoning is the most common medication cause of liver failure in the United States (Litovitz, Watson, & Klein-Schwartz, 2000). Acetaminophen ( N-acetyl- p-aminophenol, paracetamol, or APAP) is the most popular over-the-counter (OTC) analgesic used in the United States and is reported as one of the most common toxic exposures reported to poison control centers nationwide (Hung & Nelson, 2000). Acetaminophen has been available since 1950 and is widely used in its single and compound formulas in both OTC and prescription medications. This drug is used for a variety of pain syndromes in both long-term care and palliative care settings, which can attribute to chronic use.
Acetaminophen use was identified by the American College of Rheumatology (2000) and the American Geriatrics Society (1998) as the analgesic of choice for the treatment and management of osteoarthritis. Numerous studies have identified that the U.S. population is living longer and often experiencing chronic pain syndromes that potentiate an increased vulnerability to drug-induced hepatic injury, while at the same time necessitating medical treatment for pain conditions that warrant aggressive symptom control. Hepatic injury with acetaminophen can occur with chronic use over time at lower doses (<4 g/day), particularly in the presence of other predisposing factors (McClain, Price, Barve et al., 1999). Therefore, the influence of advanced age in conjunction with the management of treating symptoms can pose an increased risk for liver toxicity. Age-related hepatic and renal dysfunction can lead to higher drug concentrations—a result of reduced drug metabolism and excretion capacities (Jakobsson, Klevsgard, & Westergen, 2003).
Causes of Acetaminophen Toxicity
Liver damage from excessive acetaminophen ingestion can occur in four circumstances (Lee, 2003):
▪ Excessive intake of acetaminophen
▪ Excessive cytochrome P450 activity due to inductions by chronic alcohol or other drug use
▪ Decreased capacity for glucuronidation or sulfation
▪ Depletion of glutathione stores due to malnutrition or chronic alcohol ingestion
A number of other factors can influence the propensity of acetaminophen to cause hepatotoxicity, including comorbid diseases and the patient’s age, genetic background, and/or nutritional status. Food and dietary regimens high in protein can enhance the activity of the cytochrome P450 system as it relates to pharmaceutical utilization. Protein can increase the potential for converting a specific drug to its toxic metabolite (Lee, 2003). These metabolites can mediate toxicity close to or within the tissue where they are generated—creating additional tissue injury (Meyer, 2001). Numerous studies have also correlated a strong association between the age of the patient and the number of medications prescribed, all adding to the complexity of pharmaceutical biotransformation (see Chapter 7). It is important for the advanced practice nurse to appreciate that the physiologic changes associated with aging within the liver alter the pharmacokinetics of many drugs, including frequently used analgesics such as acetaminophen (Beckman, 2002). This predisposes the elderly to an increased risk of adverse drug events.
ASSOCIATED SYMPTOMS
Clinical manifestations of end-stage liver disease follow a similar pattern despite the causative etiology. Early indications of disease are often vague and include gastrointestinal symptoms such as anorexia, indigestion, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and complaints of dull, diffuse abdominal pain. The major symptoms that often accompany the early manifestations of this disease occur as a result of hepatic insufficiency and portal hypertension and may lead to the following organ system abnormalities (Isselbacher & Podolsky, 2004):
▪ Respiratory Pleural effusion and limited thoracic expansion due to abdominal ascites interfering with efficient gas exchange and eventual hypoxia
▪ Central nervous system Progressive symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy: lethargy, mental changes, slurred speech, asterixis, peripheral neuritis, paranoia, hallucinations, extreme obtundation, and coma
▪ Endocrine Testicular atrophy, menstrual irregularities, gynecomastia, and loss of chest and axillary hair
▪ Skin Severe pruritus, extreme dryness, poor tissue turgor, abnormal pigmentation, spider angiomas, palm erythema, and possibly jaundice
▪ Hepatic Jaundice, hepatomegaly, ascites, edema of legs, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome, comprising the other major effects of full-fledged cirrhosis
Additional symptoms can include a musty (acetone) breath, enlarged superficial abdominal veins, muscle atrophy, pain in right abdominal quadrant that worsens when the patient sits up or leans forward, palpable liver or spleen, and temperature of 101° to 103° F. Bleeding from esophageal varices can occur from an increase in the portal vascularity leading to hypertension and increasing the likelihood of esophageal hemorrhage (Meyer, 2001).
Chronic liver failure caused by acetaminophen toxicity can present with varying complications. Patients may be asymptomatic, with only incidentally detected laboratory test abnormalities, or they may have obvious features of liver involvement. Typically, drug hepatotoxicity begins 1 to 2 months after initiation of a drug, but latency may be longer (Krahenbuhl & Reichen, 2000).
HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
An extensive patient history is crucial when evaluating for liver pathologies and/or gastrointestinal complaints during any juncture of the disease. Evaluation of suspected liver disease begins with a detailed assessment of risk factors (Kamath, 2001), followed by a clear chronological account of the patient’s current situation that includes the onset of the problem, the setting in which it developed, and identification of concomitant manifestations. Identification of factors that alleviate or exacerbate the patient’s symptoms is helpful. Additional assessment should query the patient about previous surgeries; abdominal or liver traumas; alcohol ingestion; comorbid pathologies; past or present viral, bacterial, parasitic, or fungal infections; and a family history of illnesses, as this health information is valuable and may influence treatment options. In addition, it is important to include a current list of medications taken, dosages used, allergies, previous drug toxicities, illicit drug use, OTC medications, herbal products, and any drug-drug interactions previously experienced. A study by Bernard and Bruera (2000) identified patients who were admitted to palliative settings and generally prescribed six or seven medications at any given time, contributing to the risk of adverse drug reactions and to drug-to-drug interactions. Many of these patients were prescribed 10 to 20 different medications and had a 20% or greater chance of experiencing a significant adverse drug-to-drug event, which can be fatal.
The patient’s general appearance and vital signs may suggest clues to his or her overall condition and stability. Inspection, palpation, and auscultation of the abdomen may disclose signs of abdominal inflammation, scars, abdominal bulges, hernias, or distention; symmetry; and skin color. The liver and spleen are measured, and abdominal percussion identifies the amount of air in the stomach and bowel. Percussion also identifies the presence of abdominal masses and ascites. Many individuals with cirrhosis in the early stage often present with few nonspecific symptoms, making the diagnosis less obvious.
DIAGNOSTICS
Causes of liver injury are diverse, ranging from isolated and clinically silent laboratory abnormalities to dramatic and rapidly progressive liver failure. This spectrum relates in part to the broad range of pathophysiologic processes that can damage the liver and in part to the reserve capacity of the organ, which is large and can mask significant injury. It is estimated that approximately 40% of patients with cirrhosis are asymptomatic. When the diagnosis of end-stage liver disease is confirmed, the diagnosis often is confirmed before the patient seeks palliative care treatment (Fitz, 2003). However, some diagnostics may be appropriate and guide interventions that enhance the patient’s diagnosis and comfort. Plasma ammonia levels are often markedly elevated in end-stage liver disease (Kichian & Bain, 2003). The diagnosis of liver injury from acetaminophen toxicity should be confirmed by a serum acetaminophen level, laboratory markers include evaluating the aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bilirubin, electrolytes, and prothrombin time. The clinician can also order an abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography scan to investigate for suspected biliary obstruction or abdominal masses (Kichian & Bain, 2003).
CONCLUSION
Human illness results from a complex interplay of clinical, biologic, psychologic, and sociologic variables. The clinician’s understanding of these diverse yet interacting variables is critical for appropriate treatment of end-stage liver disease (Yamada, 1998). The clinician aids in giving realistic prognostic information and facilitating exchange of information with every patient when discussing appropriate diagnostics in relationship to the goals of care. Skilled, compassionate palliative care clinicians should continue to use their expertise in maintaining safe prescribing practices by reviewing individual patients’ medication profiles on a routine basis, which will assist in avoiding adverse drug reactions and toxicities. Some adverse drug events can be minimized by reducing the number of drugs prescribed and by use of a dose interval and route based on known drug pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics (Bernard & Bruera, 2000).
REFERENCES
American College of Rheumatology, Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, Am Rheumatol 43 (2000) 1905–1915.
American Geriatrics Society, Clinical practice guidelines and management of chronic pain in older persons, Geriatrics 5 (1998) 235–249.
Beckman, M., The bulk of pain on the shoulders of aging, Sci Aging Knowl 16 (2002) 173–186.
Bernard, S.A.; Bruera, E., Drug interactions in palliative care, J Clin Oncol 18 (2000) 1780–1799.
Kichian, K.; Bain, G., Jaundice, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy, In: (Editors: Doyle, D.; Hanks, G.; Cherny, N.; Calman, K.) Oxford textbook of palliative medicine3rd ed. ( 2003)Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 507–519.
Fitz, J.G., Disease of the liver and biliary system, In: (Editors: Friedman, S.L.; McQuaid, K.R.; Grendell, J.H.) Current diagnosis and treatment in gastroenterology ( 2003)McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 521–535.
Hung, O.L.; Nelson, L.S., Acetaminophen, In: (Editors: Tintinalli, J.; Kelen, G.; Stapczynski, S.) Emergency medicine ( 2000)McGraw-Hill, Baltimore, pp. 1088–1094.
Isselbacher, K.J.; Podolsky, D.K., Approach to the patient with gastrointestinal disease, In: (Editors: Kasper, D.L.; Braunwald, E.; Fauci, A.; Hauser, S.) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine ( 2004)McGraw-Hill, New York.
Jakobsson, U.; Klevsgard, R.; Westergen, A., Old people in pain: A comparative study, J Pain Symptom Manage 26 (2003) 625–636.
Kamath, P.S., A model to predict survival in patients with end stage liver disease, Hepatology 33 (2001) 464.
Kichian, S.; Bain, V., Drug-induced liver disease, Hepatology 31 (2003) 201–236.
Krahenbuhl, S.; Reichen, J., Drug hepatotoxcity, In: (Editors: Bacon, B.R.; Di Bisceglie, A.M.) Liver disease, diagnosis, and management ( 2000)Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp. 294–309.
Kuebler, K.; Varga, J.; Mihelic, R.A., Why there is no cookbook approach to palliative care: Implications of the P450 enzyme system, Clin J Oncol Nurs 7 (2003) 569–572.
Lee, W.M., Drug-induced hepatotoxicity, N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 474.
McClain, C.J.; Price, S.; Barve, S.; et al., Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: An update, Curr Gastroenterol Rep 1 (1999) 42–49.
Meyer, U.A., Drugs and toxins—drug handling, In: (Editors: Boyer, J.L.; Blum, H.E.; Maier, K.P.; et al.) Liver cirrhosis and its development ( 2001)Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 236–241.
Watson, W.A.; Litovitz, T.L.; Rodgers Jr., G.C.; et al., 2002 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System, Am J Emerg Med 21 (2003) 353–421.
Yamada, T., Handbook of gastroenterology. ( 1998)Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.