116

Published on 03/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1084 times

CASE 116

image
image

History: A 41-year-old woman presents with abdominal pain.

1. Which of the following should be included in the differential diagnosis of the imaging finding shown in the figures? (Choose all that apply.)

A. Lymphoma

B. Pseudoaneurysm

C. Pancreatic cancer

D. Lymphadenopathy

E. Focal acute pancreatitis

2. Which of the following complications of acute pancreatitis usually develops early in the course of the disease?

A. Abscess

B. Necrosis

C. Pseudocyst

D. Pseudoaneurysm

3. What is the most definitive means to diagnose benign focal pancreatitis in differentiation from pancreatic carcinoma?

A. Biopsy

B. MRI scan

C. PET scan

D. Follow-up CT

4. Contrast-enhanced CT is the standard imaging modality for evaluating acute pancreatitis and its complications. Which of the following is a contraindication to the performance of a contrast-enhanced CT?

A. Hepatic insufficiency

B. The high radiation dose

C. Allergy to intravenous contrast

D. When cholelithiasis has not been excluded as the underlying cause

ANSWERS

CASE 116

Unusual Presentation of Acute Pancreatitis

1. A, C, D, and E

2. B

3. D

4. C

References

Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology. 1994;193:297–306.

Neff CC, Simeone JF, Wittenberg J, et al: Inflammatory pancreatic masses. Problems in differentiating focal pancreatitis from carcinoma. Radiology. 1984;150:35–38.

Cross-Reference

Gastrointestinal Imaging: THE REQUISITES, 3rd ed, p 154.

Comment

Acute pancreatitis has a variety of imaging presentations, including disease seemingly limited to the pancreatic head, as seen in this case. In most cases, more of the gland is involved with edema, and hemorrhage and necrosis occur in a few patients. Necrosis and sepsis constitute the leading causes of death in acute pancreatitis.

Most acute pancreatitis involving the pancreatic head can have a very adverse effect on the biliary system, compressing the common bile duct just as a pancreatic malignant mass might. However, that is not always the case, as with this patient. These lesions always present a dilemma and are often biopsied to rule out carcinoma. About 25% to 30% of all cases of pancreatitis manifest with findings limited to the pancreatic head (see figures). Gallstones passing through the shared ampulla of Vater can also give rise to inflammatory changes in the pancreatic head as well as throughout the entire gland. The stone does always have to be present. Some stones lodge, cause havoc with pancreatic drainage, and then pass. More than 80% of patients with gallstone pancreatitis have stones detected in stool. However, most of these have accompanying bile duct obstruction and some degree of distal pancreatic duct obstruction. In this case, the lack of biliary involvement and the normal distal pancreas suggest an inflammatory origin. A calcification in the ampulla of Vater would seal the diagnosis.

In rare instances, pancreatic carcinoma manifests as acute pancreatitis. When there is no etiologic basis for acute pancreatitis in a middle-aged or older adult, cancer is a consideration.