11: Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

Published on 18/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2502 times

Procedure 11 Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

Indications

image Failure of conservative treatment for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

image Patient prefers the endoscopic procedure.

image The authors’ preferred technique is the limited incision open carpal tunnel release (LOCTR) (see Procedure 12). Studies have not demonstrated significant differences in outcomes between endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and LOCTR. ECTR has a steep learning curve, needs a sizeable initial capital investment in video equipment, and incurs the recurring cost of the single-use disposable blade. Although the time taken to perform ECTR is less than for LOCTR, the time expended to set up the equipment mitigates this advantage.

image Occasionally, patients request the endoscopic procedure. They are counseled with regard to the cost and complications. We prefer the single-portal Agee technique to the double-portal Chow technique because the Agee technique avoids a scar in the palm.

Surgical Anatomy

image The carpal tunnel is a fibro-osseous tunnel that contains the median nerve and the nine flexor tendons to the thumb and the fingers. The roof of the carpal tunnel is formed by the flexor retinaculum, which extends between four bony prominences (proximally: pisiform and tubercle of scaphoid, distally: hook of the hamate and tubercle of trapezium) (Fig. 11-1).

image The flexor retinaculum can be divided into three components (see Fig. 11-1).

image Some authors consider the flexor retinaculum and the TCL to be synonymous.

image The carpal tunnel is narrowest in both palmar-dorsal and ulnar-radial planes at the level of the hook of the hamate. The other narrow portion of the carpal tunnel is at the proximal edge of the TCL (see Fig. 11-1).

image The important surface landmarks and surrounding neurovascular structures related to the carpal tunnel are as follows (Fig. 11-2):

The palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve arises from the radial aspect of the median nerve about 5 cm proximal to the wrist crease (see Fig. 11-2). It runs parallel to the median nerve for 1.6 to 2.5 cm and then passes under the antebrachial fascia between the palmaris longus (PL) and the flexor carpi radialis (FCR). About 0.8 cm proximal to the wrist crease, it pierces the antebrachial fascia, becoming superficial to the flexor retinaculum.

image The ulnar nerve and artery overlie the ulnar border of the flexor retinaculum and may be at risk during ECTR. The nerve is generally anterior or ulnar to the hook of the hamate, but the artery is often immediately superficial to the flexor retinaculum lying within a fat-filled space (Fig. 11-5).

Procedure

Evidence

Beck JD, Deegan JH, Rhoades D, Klena JC. Results of endoscopic carpal tunnel release relative to surgeon experience with the Agee technique. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2011;36:61-64.

A total of 278 patients (358 procedures) underwent ECTR. Twelve patients required conversion to OCTR over a 2-year period. In the first 6 months of practice, 8 of 71 ECTRs were converted to OCTR compared with 1 of 72 in the second 6 months. In year 2, 3 of 215 patients were converted to OCTR. A learning curve for ECTR was present, and the rates of conversion significantly diminished with increased surgeon and anesthesia experience. No patients required repeat surgery for recurrence of carpal tunnel symptoms. The authors reported no major neurovascular complications. (Level IV evidence)

Schmelzer RE, Della Rocca GJ, Caplin DA. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a review of 753 cases in 486 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:177-185.

The authors evaluated outcomes of ECTR in a large patient cohort (486 patients, 753 hands). Data included demographics, subjective complaints, prior interventions, preoperative examination findings, and postoperative follow-up. All follow-up data were obtained from a single, independent occupational therapy clinic. Three hundred seventy-seven patients were gainfully employed at presentation, and 206 filed a workers’ compensation claim. Four hundred eighty-six patients (100%) obtained symptom relief. Complications included 1 transient median nerve neurapraxia, 6 complaints of residual pain, and 1 complaint of hypersensitivity. Workers’ compensation patients and non–workers’ compensation patients returned to work full-duty at similar times postoperatively. Ninety percent of employed patients returned to their original occupation. They concluded that ECTR was safe and effective. Patients demonstrated a high return-to-work rate and an extremely low complication rate. The data challenged the belief that endoscopic carpal tunnel release results in higher complication rates. (Level IV evidence)