Case 11

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 1268 times

CASE 11

image
image
image

ANSWERS

CASE 11

Constrictive Pericarditis

1A, D, and E

2D

3A

4B

Reference

Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, et al. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics. 2003;23 Spec No:S167–S180.

Cross-Reference

Cardiac Imaging: The REQUISITES, ed 3, pp 269–276.

Comment

Imaging

Chest radiograph shows a large left pleural effusion and extensive pericardial calcification, best visualized on the lateral radiograph (Figs. A and B). Chest CT confirms these findings and shows bilateral calcified pleural plaques indicating asbestos exposure (Fig. C). Extensive pericardial calcification is diagnostic of constrictive pericarditis in the setting of constrictive or restrictive physiology.

Differential Diagnosis

Symptoms and signs of constrictive pericarditis are nonspecific and include dyspnea, orthopnea, lower extremity edema, and ascites. CT and MRI are useful to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. This distinction is important because treatments are vastly different. Constrictive pericarditis is treated surgically with pericardial stripping, whereas restrictive cardiomyopathy is managed medically or with heart transplantation. In patients with constrictive or restrictive physiology, ventricular filling is reduced leading to equalization of atrial and ventricular pressures. Echocardiography is unable to depict pericardial thickening accurately. Cross-sectional imaging findings of constrictive pericarditis include a pericardial thickness greater than or equal to 4 mm, pericardial calcification (Figs. B and C), and a diastolic septal bounce. Pericardial thickening may be diffuse or localized to the right heart or atrioventricular grooves.