Case 106

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1237 times

CASE 106

image
image
image

1Which lesions might have been treated with the device shown? (Choose all that apply.)

A. Ventricular septal defect

B. Atrial septal defect

C. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection

D. Patent foramen ovale

2Which complication of this procedure is most readily apparent on radiographs?

A. Unsatisfactory placement

B. Migration

C. Pericardial effusion

D. Thrombus formation

3Which of the following statements regarding limitations of the performance of cardiac MRI in this patient is true?

A. MRI is safe to perform, and there are no limitations related to the device.

B. MRI is safe to perform, but the device might cause an artifact.

C. MRI is not safe to perform because of potential heating of the device.

D. MRI is not safe to perform because of potential migration of the device.

4Which MRI artifact would most likely be caused by the device?

A. Aliasing

B. Spin dephasing

C. Ringing

D. Susceptibility

ANSWERS

CASE 106

Atrial Septal Closure Device

1B and D

2B

3B

4D

References

Burney K, Thayur N, Husain SA, et al. Imaging of implants on chest radiographs: a radiological perspective. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(3):204–212.

Marie Valente A, Rhodes JF. Current indications and contraindications for transcatheter atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure. Am Heart J. 2007;153(4 suppl):81–84.

Shellock FG. Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), atrial septal defect (ASD), ventricular septal defect (VSD) occluders, and patent foramen ovale closure devices. MRIsafety.com (accessed February 8, 2013).

Comment

Indications and Complications

An atrial septal occluder device can be used for transcatheter closure of a secundum atrial septal defect (ASD). Contraindications include a mild shunt (pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio <1.5 : 1), an ASD that is larger than the device, a defect other than a secundum ASD, and severe pulmonary hypertension. Complications include unsatisfactory placement, migration, pericardial effusion, and thrombus formation. The device can be used to close a patent foramen ovale, but there is some controversy related to this issue.

Imaging

Chest radiographs are capable of identifying the device (Figs. A and B) and assessing the possibility of migration. Other complications are more difficult to ascertain with radiographs. CT (Fig. C) can be performed to identify complications, but it has not been extensively studied for this indication. As of 2012, MRI can be performed safely, but metallic artifact can limit evaluation of the area of the device.