Lower Leg, Ankle, and Foot

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 16/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3.7 (3 votes)

This article have been viewed 14935 times

Lower Leg, Ankle, and Foot

At least 80% of the general population has foot problems, but these problems can often be corrected by proper assessment, treatment, and, above all, care of the feet. Lesions of the ankle and foot can alter the mechanics of gait resulting in movement impairments and, as a result, cause stress on other lower limb joints, which in turn may lead to pathology in these joints.1

The foot and ankle combine flexibility with stability because of the many bones, their shapes, and their attachments. The lower leg, ankle, and foot have two principal functions: propulsion and support. For propulsion, they act like a flexible lever; for support, they act like a rigid structure that holds up the entire body.

Although the joints of the lower leg, ankle, and foot are discussed separately, they act as functional groups, not as isolated joints. As the terminal part of the lower kinetic chain, the lower leg, ankle, and foot have the ability to distribute and dissipate the different forces (e.g., compressive, shearing, rotary, tensile) acting on the body through contact with the ground.2 This is especially evident during gait. In the foot, the movement occurring at each individual joint is minimal. However, when combined, there normally is sufficient range of motion (ROM) in all of the joints to allow functional mobility as well as functional stability. For ease of understanding, the joints of the foot are divided into three sections: hindfoot (rearfoot), midfoot, and forefoot.

Applied Anatomy

Hindfoot (Rearfoot)

Tibiofibular Joint.

The inferior (distal) tibiofibular joint is a fibrous or syndesmosis type of joint. It is supported by the anterior tibiofibular, posterior tibiofibular, and inferior transverse ligaments as well as the interosseous ligaments (Figure 13-1). The movements at this joint are minimal but allow a small amount of spread (1 to 2 mm) at the ankle joint during dorsiflexion. This same action allows the fibula to move up and down during dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. Dorsiflexion at the ankle joint causes the fibula to move superiorly, putting stress on both the inferior tibiofibular joint at the ankle and the superior tibiofibular joint at the knee. The fibula carries more of the axial load when it is dorsiflexed. On average, the fibula carries about 17% of the axial loading.3 The joint is supplied by the deep peroneal and tibial nerves.

Talocrural (Ankle) Joint.

The talocrural joint is a uniaxial, modified hinge, synovial joint located between the talus, the medial malleolus of the tibia, and the lateral malleolus of the fibula. The talus is shaped so that in dorsiflexion it is wedged between the malleoli, allowing little or no inversion or eversion at the ankle joint. The talus is approximately 2.4 mm (0.1 inch) wider anteriorly than posteriorly. The medial malleolus is shorter, extending halfway down the talus, whereas the lateral malleolus extends almost to the level of the subtalar joint. The joint is supplied by branches of the tibial and deep peroneal nerves.

The talocrural joint is designed for stability, especially in dorsiflexion. In plantar flexion, it is much more mobile. This joint is responsible for the anterior-posterior (dorsiflexion-plantar flexion) movement that occurs in the ankle-foot complex. Its close packed position is maximum dorsiflexion, and its capsular pattern is more a limitation of plantar flexion than of dorsiflexion. This joint is most stable in the dorsiflexed position. The resting position is 10° of plantar flexion, midway between maximum inversion and maximum eversion. The talocrural joint has one degree of freedom, and the movements possible at this joint are dorsiflexion and plantar flexion.

On the medial side of the joint, the major ligament is the deltoid or medial collateral ligament, which consists of four separate ligaments: the tibionavicular, tibiocalcanean, and posterior tibiotalar ligaments superficially, all of which resist talar abduction, and the anterior tibiotalar ligament, which lies deep to the other three ligaments and resists lateral translation and lateral rotation of the talus. On the lateral aspect, the talocrural joint is supported by the anterior talofibular ligament, which provides stability against excessive inversion of the talus; the posterior talofibular ligament, which resists ankle dorsiflexion, adduction (“tilt”), medial rotation, and medial translation of the talus; and the calcaneofibular ligament, which provides stability against maximum inversion at the ankle and subtalar joints. The anterior talofibular ligament is the ligament most commonly injured by a lateral ankle sprain, followed by the calcaneofibular ligament.

Subtalar (Talocalcanean) Joint.

The subtalar joint is a synovial joint having three degrees of freedom and a close packed position of supination. Supporting the subtalar joint are the lateral talocalcanean and medial talocalcanean ligaments. In addition, the interosseous talocalcanean and cervical ligaments limit eversion.

The movements possible at the subtalar joint are gliding and rotation. With injury to the area (e.g., sprain, fracture), this joint and the talocrural joint often become hypomobile, partially because the talus has no muscles attaching to it. Medial rotation of the leg causes a valgus (outward) movement of the calcaneus, whereas lateral rotation of the leg produces a varus (inward) movement of the calcaneus. The axis of the joint is at an angle of 40° to 45° inclined vertically and 15° to 18° to the sagittal plane.

Midfoot (Midtarsal Joints)

In isolation, the midtarsal joints allow only a minimal amount of movement. Taken together, however, they allow significant movement to enable the foot to adapt to many positions without putting undue stress on the joints. Chopart joint refers collectively to the midtarsal joints between the talus-calcaneus and the navicular-cuboid.

Talocalcaneonavicular Joint.

The talocalcaneonavicular joint is a ball-and-socket synovial joint with 3° of freedom. Its close packed position is supination, and the dorsal talonavicular ligament, bifurcated ligament, and plantar calcaneonavicular (spring) ligament support the joint (see Figure 13-1; Figure 13-2). Movements possible at this joint are gliding and rotation.

Cuneonavicular Joint.

The cuneonavicular joint is a plane synovial joint with a close packed position of supination. The movements possible at this joint are slight gliding and rotation.

Cuboideonavicular Joint.

The cuboideonavicular joint is fibrous, its close packed position being supination. The movements possible at this joint are slight gliding and rotation.

Intercuneiform Joints.

The intercuneiform joints are plane synovial joints with a close packed position of supination. The movements possible at these joints are slight gliding and rotation.

Cuneocuboid Joint.

The cuneocuboid joint is a plane synovial joint with a close packed position of supination. The movements of slight gliding and rotation are possible at this joint.

Calcaneocuboid Joint.

The calcaneocuboid joint is saddle shaped with a close packed position of supination. Supporting this joint are the bifurcated ligament, the calcaneocuboid ligament, and the long plantar ligaments. The movement possible at this joint is gliding with conjunct rotation.

Forefoot

Tarsometatarsal Joints.

The tarsometatarsal joints are plane synovial joints with a close packed position of supination. The movement possible at these joints is gliding. Taken together, these joints are referred to as Lisfranc joint.4

Intermetatarsal Joints.

The four intermetatarsal joints are plane synovial joints with a close packed position of supination. The movement possible at these joints is gliding.

Metatarsophalangeal Joints.

The five metatarsophalangeal joints are condyloid synovial joints with 2° of freedom. Their close packed position is full extension. Their capsular pattern is variable for the lateral four joints and more limitation of extension than flexion for the hallux (big toe); their resting position is 10° of extension. The movements possible at these joints are flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction.

Interphalangeal Joints.

The interphalangeal joints are synovial hinge joints with 1° of freedom. The close packed position is full extension, and the capsular pattern is more limitation of flexion than of extension. The resting position of the distal and proximal interphalangeal joints is slight flexion. The movements possible at these joints are flexion and extension.

Patient History

It is important to take a detailed and complete history when assessing the lower leg, ankle, and foot. In addition to the questions listed under the “Patient History” section in Chapter 1 the examiner should obtain the following information from the patient:

1. What is the patient’s occupation? Whether the patient stands a great deal and the types of surfaces on which the patient usually stands may have bearing on what is causing the problem.

2. What was the mechanism of injury? What was the position of the foot at the time of the injury? Ankle sprains occur most often when the foot is plantar flexed, inverted, and adducted, with injury to the anterior talofibular ligament, anterolateral capsule, and possibly the distal tibiofibular ligament.5,6 This same mechanism can lead to peroneal tendon injury, a malleolar or talar dome fracture, and sinus tarsi syndrome.7,8 Figure 13-3 outlines some of the common mechanisms of injury to the ankle. Table 13-1 outlines the West Point Sprain Grading System that can be used to determine the severity of ankle sprains.9 With injury to the lateral ligaments, the structures (articular surfaces) may be damaged on the medial side owing to compression leading to medial as well as lateral pain.10 In fact, if the lateral ligaments are completely torn and the capsule disrupted, medial pain may predominate. Anterolateral pain without a history of trauma may be the result of anterior impingement especially after injury to the anterior talofibular ligament. Lin et al.11 developed a clinical prediction rule for ankle impingement (see the following box) that would preclude the need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The impingement may be due to thickening of the joint capsule and/or bone spurs adjacent to the anterior talocrural joint.12 Achilles tendinosis or paratenonitis often arises as the result of overuse, increased activity, or change in a high-stress training program. Osteochondral lesions most commonly occur with trauma and may accompany ankle sprains and fractures with symptoms being exacerbated by prolonged weight bearing or high impact activities.13 A dorsiflexion injury, accompanied by a snapping and pain on the lateral aspect that rapidly diminishes, may indicate a tear of the peroneal retinaculum.14 Taunton et al.15 list some causes of overuse injuries in the lower limb.

Clinical Prediction Rule for Anterolateral Ankle Impingement11

Note: Five of six symptoms must be positive.

From Liu SH, Nuccion SL, Finerman G: Diagnosis of anterolateral ankle impingement: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination. Am J Sports Med 25:389–393, 1997.

3. Did the patient notice a transient or fixed deformity of the foot or ankle at the time of injury? Was there any transitory locking (e.g., loose body, muscle spasm)? An affirmative answer may indicate a fracture causing immediate swelling that decreased as it spread into the surrounding tissue.

4. Was the patient able to continue the activity after the injury? If so, the injury is probably not too severe, provided there is no loss of stability. Inability to bear weight, severe pain, and rapid swelling indicate a severe injury.14 Walking is compatible with a second-degree sprain; pain with running usually indicates a first-degree injury.16

5.  Was there any swelling or bruising (ecchymosis) (Figure 13-4, A)? How quickly and where did it develop? This question can elicit some idea of the type of swelling (e.g., blood, synovial, purulent) and whether it is intracapsular or extracapsular. Figure 13-4, B, shows “skate bite” in which there is swelling over the extensor tendons of the foot caused by irritation from doing up stiff ice skates too tight.

6. Are symptoms improving, becoming worse, or staying the same? It is important to know the type of onset (macrotrauma, microtrauma) and the duration and intensity of symptoms (acute, subacute, chronic). Edwards et al.17 outlined some of the chronic causes of leg pain in athletes.

7. What are the sites and boundaries of pain or abnormal sensation? The examiner should note whether the pattern is one of a dermatome, a peripheral nerve, or another painful structure. If pain and other physical findings are “out of proportion” to what would normally be expected with injury especially in the rearfoot/talar region, a more diligent examination including extra radiographic images of the talus and calcaneus may be necessary.18

8. What is the patient’s usual activity or pastime? Answers to this question should give some idea of the stresses placed on the lower leg, ankle, and foot; how frequently they are applied; and whether the patient is suffering from a repetitive stress injury.

9. Does activity make a difference? Pain after activity suggests overuse. For example, with overuse injuries, pain initially comes on after the activity. As the injury progresses, pain or soreness is present at the beginning of the activity, and then it goes away during the activity only to return afterward. In later stages of the problem, the pain is constantly present. Pain during the activity suggests stress on the injured structure.

10. Where is the pain? Does the patient indicate a specific location or area? For example, with shin splints (medial tibial stress syndrome) or a compartment syndrome (acute or chronic type), the patient usually indicates a diffuse area.1922 With a stress fracture, the area of pain tends to be more specific. Anterolateral ankle impingement demonstrates anterolateral ankle joint tenderness, anterolateral ankle joint swelling (extracapsular), pain with force dorsiflexion and eversion, pain with single leg squat, pain with activities, and possible absence of ankle instability.11 Peroneal tendon problems show posterolateral pain and may be associated with lateral ankle instability.23 Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain on the antero-medial aspect of the heel.24 It may be accompanied by a heel spur (see Figure 13-135, C), which is the result of the plantar fasciitis.

11. Does walking on various terrains make a difference in regard to the foot problem? If so, which terrains cause the most obvious problem? For example, walking on grass (an uneven surface) may bother the patient more than walking on a sidewalk (a relatively even surface), or the patient may find walking on a relatively soft surface (e.g., grass) easier than walking on a hard surface (e.g., cement). Prepared surfaces, such as sidewalks, roads, and playing fields, often have a camber to allow water runoff. This camber can cause problems in some cases of overuse.

12. What types of shoes does the patient wear? What kind of heel do the shoes have? Are the shoes in good condition? Does the patient make use of orthoses? If so, are they still functional? When an appointment is being made for an assessment, the patient should be told not to wear new shoes so that the examiner can use the shoes to determine the patient’s usual shoe wear pattern. The examiner should also note whether the shoes offer proper support. The patient should bring any orthoses he or she is using to the assessment.

13. Is there a history of previous injury, affliction or surgery? For example, poliomyelitis may lead to a pes cavus. Systemic conditions, such as diabetes, gout, psoriasis, and collagen diseases, may manifest themselves first in the foot. If there was previous surgery, did the pain resolve following surgery? Is the pain the same as before surgery? Is it new pain?

14. For active people, especially runners or joggers, the following questions should also be considered25:

a. How long has the patient been running or jogging?

b. On what type of terrain and surface does the patient train?

c. In what types of workouts does the patient participate? Have the workouts changed lately? How many workouts are done per week? How far does the patient run per week? (Joggers run approximately 2 to 30 km [1.2 to 18.6 miles] per week at a pace of 5 to 10 minutes/km, and sports runners run 30 to 65 km [18.6 to 40 miles] per week at a pace of 5 to 6 minutes/km. Long-distance runners run 60 to 180 km [37 to 112 miles] per week at a pace of 4 to 5 minutes/km. Elite runners run 100 to 270 km [62 to 168 miles] per week at a pace of 3.3 to 4 minutes/km.)

d. What types of warmup, stretching, and postexercise routines does the patient do? The answers give the examiner some idea of whether the warmup and stretching activities are static or ballistic and whether these activities could be detrimental.

e. What types and styles of athletic shoes does the patient wear? (The patient should have the shoes at the examination.) Are they “control” or “cushioning” shoes? People with a cavus foot are more likely to need a cushioning shoe, whereas those with a planus foot are more likely to need a control shoe. The examiner should be able to tell if the shoes fit properly.

f. Does the patient wear socks while training? If so, what kind (e.g., cotton, wool, nylon), and how many pairs?

g. When was the patient’s last race? How long was it? When is the patient’s next race? The answers give the examiner some idea of how long the problem has been present and how long it will be until maximum stress is again placed on the joints.

image
Figure 13-3 Ankle fracture injury mechanisms.
A, Supination-lateral rotation injury. Lateral rotation forces applied to a supinated foot initially result in rupture of the anterior tibiofibular ligament (stage I). As the forces continue, a short oblique fracture of the distal portion of the fibula occurs (stage II). Stage III involves a fracture of the posterior aspect of the tibia. Stage IV is a fracture of the medial malleolus. B, Supination-adduction injury. Adduction forces applied to a supinated foot initially result in a traction or avulsion fracture of the distal portion of the fibula or rupture of the lateral ligaments (stage I). As forces continue, fracture of the medial malleolus or rupture of the deltoid ligament occurs (stage II). The fibular fracture is typically transverse, and that of the medial malleolus is oblique or nearly vertical. C, Pronation-lateral rotation injury. Forces of lateral rotation applied to a pronated foot initially result in rupture of the deltoid ligament or fracture of the medial malleolus (stage I). As forces continue, the anterior tibiofibular ligament is ruptured (stage II). A high fibular fracture (stage III) and fracture of the posterior tibial margin (stage IV) are the final stages in this mechanism of injury. D, Pronation-abduction injury. The first two stages of this injury are identical to those of the pronation-external rotation fracture complex. Stage III is a transverse supramalleolar fibular fracture that may be comminuted laterally. (Redrawn from Resnick D, Kransdorf MJ: Bone and joint imaging, Philadelphia, 2005, WB Saunders, pp. 867–868.)

TABLE 13-1

The West Point Ankle Sprain Grading System

Criterion Grade I Grade II Grade III
Location of tenderness Anterior talofibular ligament Anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament Anterior talofibular ligament, calcaneofibular ligament and posterior talofibular ligament
Edema and ecchymosis Slight and local Moderate and local Significant and diffuse
Weight-bearing ability Full or partial Difficult without crutches Impossible without significant pain
Ligament damage Stretched Partial tear Complete tear
Instability None None or slight Definite

Image

From Dutton M: Dutton’s orthopedic examination, evaluation and intervention, ed 3, New York, 2012, McGraw Hill. Data from Gerber JP, et al: Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 19:653–660, 1998.

Observation

Observation of the foot is extensive. Because of the stresses the foot is subjected to and because it, like the hand, can project signs of systemic problems and disease, the examiner should carefully and meticulously inspect the foot.

When performing the observation, the examiner should remember to compare the weight-bearing (closed-chain) with the non–weight-bearing (open-chain) posture of the foot.26 During open-chain motion, the talus is considered fixed; during closed-chain motion, the talus moves to help the foot and leg adapt to the terrain and to the stresses that are applied to the foot. Even though the calcaneus is touching a surface in closed-chain movement, for descriptive purposes, it is still considered to be moving. The weight-bearing stance of the foot shows how the body compensates for structural abnormalities (Figure 13-5). The non–weight-bearing posture shows functional and structural abilities without compensation (Figure 13-6). The observation includes looking at the patient from the front, from the side, and from behind in the weight-bearing (standing) position and from the front, from the side, and from behind in the sitting position with the legs and feet not bearing weight. The examiner should note the patient’s willingness and ability to use the feet. The bony and soft-tissue contours of the foot should be normal, and any deviation should be noted. Often, painful callosities may be found over abnormal bony prominences. The examiner should note any scars or sinuses.

Weight-Bearing Position, Anterior View

With the patient in a standing position, the examiner should observe whether the patient’s hips and trunk are in normal position. Excessive lateral rotation of the hip or rotation of the trunk away from the opposite hip elevates the medial longitudinal arch of the foot, whereas medial rotation of the hip or trunk rotation toward the opposite hip tends to flatten the arch (Figure 13-7). Medial rotation of the hip can also cause pigeon toes, which is a condition more commonly associated with medial tibial torsion or rotation. If the iliotibial band is tight, the tightness may cause eversion and lateral rotation of the foot.

The examiner should also look at the tibia to note any local or general bone swelling (Figure 13-8). Does the tibia have a normal shape, or is it bowed? Is there any torsional deformity? The medial malleolus usually lies anterior to the lateral malleolus. Pigeon toes, or toe-in deformity, result from a medial tibial torsion deformity; it does not constitute a foot deformity (Table 13-2).

Figure 13-9 shows the anterosuperior view of the feet in the weight-bearing stance. The examiner should note whether there is any asymmetry, malalignment (Table 13-3), or excessive supination or pronation of the foot. Supination of the foot involves inversion and outward rotation of the heel, adduction of the forefoot with inward rotation at the tarsometatarsal joints to maintain contact with the ground and outward rotation at the midtarsal joints, and plantar flexion at the subtalar joint and midtarsal joints so that the medial longitudinal arch is accentuated (Figure 13-10, A). In addition, along with lateral rotation of the talus, there is lateral rotation of the leg in relation to the foot (Figure 13-11). Supination of the foot causes the proximal aspect of the tibia to move posteriorly. It is required during propulsion to give rigidity to the foot and requires less muscle work than pronation.

TABLE 13-3

Malalignment About the Foot and Ankle

Malalignment Possible Correlated Motions or Postures Possible Compensatory Motions or Postures
Ankle equinus  

Rearfoot varus
Excessive subtalar supination (calcaneal varus)
Tibial; tibial and femoral; or tibial femoral, and pelvic lateral rotation

Rearfoot valgus
Excessive subtalar pronation (calcaneal valgus)
Tibial; tibial and femoral; or tibial, femoral, and pelvic medial rotation
Hallux valgus

Forefoot varus Subtalar supination and related rotation along the lower quarter

Forefoot valgus Hallux valgus
Subtalar pronation and related rotation along the lower quarter

Metatarsus adductus Hallux valgus
Medial tibial torsion
Flatfoot
Toeing-in
 
Hallux valgus Forefoot valgus
Subtalar pronation and related rotation along the lower quarter

Image

From Riegger-Krugh C, Keysor JJ: Skeletal malalignment of the lower quarter: correlated and compensatory motions and postures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 23:166, 1996.

Pronation of the foot involves eversion and inward rotation of the heel, abduction of the forefoot with outward rotation at the tarsometatarsal joints and inward rotation at the midtarsal joints, and medial rotation of the talus causing medial rotation of the leg in relation to the foot, and dorsiflexion of the subtalar and midtarsal joints (Figure 13-12), resulting in a decrease in the medial longitudinal arch (Figure 13-10, B). This movement causes the proximal aspect of the tibia to move anteriorly. The pronated foot has greater subtalar motion than the supinated foot and requires more muscle work to maintain stance stability than the supinated foot. The foot is much more mobile in this position.

The definitions used in this chapter are the ones preferred by orthopedists and podiatrists. Anatomists and kinesiologists, such as Kapandji, refer to inversion as a combination of adduction and supination and to eversion as a combination of abduction and pronation.27 Lipscomb and Ibrahim28 and Williams and Warwick29 have defined supination and pronation as opposite the terms just mentioned. Because of the confusion in terminology concerning the terms supination and pronation, readers of books and articles on the foot must be careful to discern exactly what each author means.

In the infant, the foot is normally pronated. As the child matures, the foot begins to supinate, accompanied by development of the medial longitudinal arch. The foot also appears to be more pronated in the infant because of the fat pad in the medial longitudinal arch.

The examiner should note how the patient stands and walks. Normally, in standing, 50% to 60% of the weight is taken on the heel and 40% to 50% is taken by the metatarsal heads. The foot assumes a slight toe-out position. This angle (the Fick angle) is approximately 12° to 18° from the sagittal axis of the body, developing from 5° in children (Figure 13-13).30 Asymmetrical or excessive lateral rotation of the foot may be due to acetabular retroversion, femoral retrotorsion or femoral head neck abnormalities31 (see Chapter 11). During movement, the foot is subjected to high loading, and pathology may cause the gait to be altered. The cumulative force to which each foot is subjected during the day is the equivalent of 639 metric tons in a person who weighs approximately 90 kg, or the equivalent of walking 13 km per day.

image
Figure 13-13 Fick angle.

When weight-bearing, if the relation of the foot to the ankle is normal, all of the metatarsal bones bear weight, and all of the metatarsal heads lie in the same transverse plane. The forefoot and hindfoot should be parallel to each other and to the floor. The midtarsal joints are in maximum pronation, and the subtalar joint is in neutral position. The subtalar and talocrural joints should be parallel to the floor. Finally, the posterior bisection of the calcaneus and distal one third of the leg should form two vertical, parallel lines.32

If the examiner has noted any asymmetry in standing, the examiner should place the talus (or foot) in neutral (see the “Special Tests” section) to see if the asymmetry disappears. If the asymmetry is present in normal standing, it is a functional asymmetry. If it is still present when the foot is in neutral, it is also an anatomical or structural asymmetry, in which case a structural deformity is probably causing the asymmetry. Leg-heel and forefoot-heel alignment (see the “Special Tests” section) may also be checked, especially if asymmetry is present.

The examiner should note whether the patient uses a cane or other walking aid. Use of a cane in the opposite hand diminishes the stress on the ankle joint and foot by approximately one third.

Any prominent bumps or exostoses should be noted, as should any splaying (widening) of the forefoot. Splaying of the forefoot and metatarsus primus varus is more evident in weight-bearing. There are three types of forefoot,33 based on the length of the metatarsal bones (Figure 13-14):

The examiner should note whether the toenails appear normal. Older individuals have more brittle nails. The examiner should look for warts, calluses, and corns. Warts are especially tender to the pinch (but not to direct pressure), but calluses are not. Plantar warts also tend to separate from the surrounding tissues, but calluses do not. Corns are similar to calluses but have a central nidus. They may be hard (on outside or upper aspect of toes) or soft (between toes) because of moisture.

Any swelling or pitting edema within the Achilles tendon, ankle, and foot should be noted (Figure 13-16). If there is any swelling, the examiner should note whether it is intracapsular or extracapsular. Swelling above the lateral malleolus may be related to a fibular fracture or disruption of the syndesmosis (“high” ankle sprain).34,35 This injury takes a long time to heal and may involve the anterior and/or posterior tibiofibular ligament as well as the ligaments of the talocrural joint. Swelling posterior to the lateral malleolus may indicate peroneal retinacular injury. Lateral ankle sprains initially swell distal to the lateral malleolus, but swelling may spread into the foot if the capsule has been torn (Table 13-4).14 The examiner should also check the patient’s gait for the position of the foot at heel strike, at foot flat, and at toe off. The gait cycle is described in greater detail in Chapter 14.