Chapter 12 Mammaplasty with L-shaped scar
It is important to understand why a breast is considered to be beautiful so we can recognize any esthetic changes and correct them. Beautiful is an adjective that determines what the human vision can capture from shapes, volumes, proportions, outlines, lights, glows, shadows, colors, movements, and postures. It is optics, physics, and mathematics; it is nothing subjective but is purely objective.
Throughout human evolution the limbic brain systems have been marked out with the attractive features of what is visually beautiful. One mathematical proportion (Phi) has been repeatedly stated to be found in beautiful general forms until the present. “There’s probably a natural connection between the sense of beauty and efficiency that is biologically necessary for individual survival. Phi seems to present single and wonderful properties. It is a quality that for some reason attracts attention, and it is registered in the limbic system such as beauty, harmony and balance”.1 Phi is a universal constant ratio of 1/1.618 (Fig. 12.1).
The Greek philosophers Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, and Euclid studied the proportion Phi (1/1.618) known as the Phi ratio and felt that beautiful creations respected certain geometrical laws displaying harmony.2 It is not known when the Phi ratio was first described or applied but it has always existed in the fields of mathematics and physics. Because the Greek sculptor Phidias used that proportion so much, it was called Phi, the Greek letter for the first part of his name. This proportion was also described by Leonardo Fibonacci of Pisa, in his development of mathematical sequences. Leonardo da Vinci called it the “golden proportion” and used it in Vetruvian Man. It has been used in the design of such classic edifices as the Parthenon. Botanists have found it in phylotaxy.3 In the twentieth century there were psychological studies about significant preferences for structures containing the Phi proportion.4
The shape of the breast contains and molds its volume. Individual will, period, cultures, and fads have determined a range of desirable volumes over time. Volume and shape are different aspects and must be analyzed separately. If a breast contains or approximates the golden ratio, it is considered beautiful, even if the volume is not.
Considering the shape of the breast as an irregular cone, the horizontal diameter is smaller than the vertical in a ratio of 1 to 1.3. This ratio is the consequence of the application of Phi to the vertical axis with the shape of the golden oval (Fig. 12.2A–C). The axis ABCD (Fig. 12.2A). is the breast meridian line (BML) and it is comprised of two other horizontal lines: the lowest horizontal breast line (LHBL), which connects the inframammary sulcus where it meets the breast meridian line (points I); and the highest horizontal breast line (HHBL), which connects the highest point of the two anterior axillary folds. The vertical measure between both lines is a single mark for each patient, determining the vertical extension of the base of the breast. Applying the ratio of 1 to 1.3 to this, the consequential and proportional lateral extension is obtained.
From the frontal view of the breast, when there is skin flaccidity, there will be ptosis; the vertical and horizontal axes tend to invert their proportions – the vertical decreases and the horizontal increases – and cleavage is diminished. The points I remain unaltered.
The normal thoracic skeleton in the anterior external costal region has an anatomic inclination of approximately 18° in relation to the vertical axis of the body in the area of the breast implants. When the golden triangle is inclined over this angle in relation to the vertical plane, it will resemble the beautiful breast from the profile (Fig. 12.3A, B).
A normal breast without ptosis, from a lateral view, is above the horizontal plane A (LHBL). Plane A coincides with points I (the intersection of the breast meridian line with the inframammary sulcus). The other horizontal plane (M) crosses the apex of the mammary cone and divides the breast into two segments: superior and inferior. Point M is determined from where it crosses the breast meridian, where in general the nipple is found (this and the areola may be ectopic – outside the apex of the cone).
The ideal measurement of the breast from the apex of the cone to point I is between 7 and 12 cm. These measures may vary according to country, times, and trends. Smaller measurements will determine breasts of lesser volume and projection and vice versa. Smaller breasts are closer to 7 cm and larger breasts toward 12 cm. The section of the breast above the apex of the cone to the HHBL measures 1.618 times the size of the section below it. This is the golden ratio once again.
From the vertical point of view of the individual, when the patient looks at herself from above, the normal, beautiful breast is between two vertical lines: the vertical lateral breast line (VLBL) and the vertical medial breast line (VMBL). The former coincides with the anterior axillary line; the latter is situated 1 to 2 cm laterally to the middle line of the sternum (Fig. 12.4A, B).
Applying a geometric analysis to the vertical view, it is observed that four golden triangles are joined by their closest sides and by their apexes, forming a golden pyramid. If this pyramid is turned on its vertical axis, a golden cone is obtained. This presents the relationship of 1 to 1.618 between its height and base and resembles a beautiful breast as seen from a vertical view. If the lines from the base to the apex are curved, it resembles a beautiful breast from a vertical view.
The author believes that the golden ratio must not be fixed as an exact measure, but rather be considered an indisputable reference in determining an anatomical standard for the shape of a beautiful breast, which is mathematically replicable. A shape of a beautiful breast exists when it presents at 1 to 1.5. Furthermore, a breast can have a beautiful shape, though little volume, when the extremes of the horizontal and vertical diameters do not touch the horizontal and vertical lines described and established at the thorax as their limits.
According to the frontal, lateral and vertical views (base and cone projection without ptosis), it is possible to observe the various shapes of the breast and to classify hypomastias and hypertrophies (Fig. 12.5A, B).
Group I: The breast is normal (normomastia). Base, profile and projection fall within the golden ovoid, golden triangle and golden cone, respectively. They fit within the two horizontal lines (HHBL and LHBL) and the two vertical lines (VMBL and VLBL) previously referred to. This is the control group described in “earlier”. The characteristics of Group I are the same for both hypomastia and hypertrophy classifications.
The breast grows, stretching the skin as a skin expander. The direction of growth is three-dimensional until various shapes and volumes are achieved, consistent with hormonal stimulation and the amount of “sprouting”. Only at the end of the growth process do we observe the final shape and volume and amount of ptosis.
The anteroposterior growth projects the breast into space and subjects it to gravitational forces; progressively the breast falls, except at point I of the inframammary sulcus. This ptosis starts after puberty and continues throughout life (Fig. 12.6).
In lateral view: the thorax is considered to be a vertical plane and the breasts are placed on it. If we observe no ptosis, it is like the initial description, above plane A with no ptosis. The falling breast (where planes A and M coincide) still has no mammary ptosis is still zero (on the breast borderline). The superior upper pole is partially emptied. As the ptosis continues, plane M will exceed down the plane A. Ptosis is installed (Fig. 12.7A).